Hi,
On 8/19/25 5:22 PM, Bagas Sanjaya wrote:
> Commit 9e260e4590e044 ("docs: bcachefs: idle work scheduling design doc")
> adds design doc (desiderata) for idle work scheduling, but missed
> explicit title, causing its two section headings to be toctree entries
> instead.
>
> Add the title.
>
> Fixes: 9e260e4590e0 ("docs: bcachefs: idle work scheduling design doc")
> Signed-off-by: Bagas Sanjaya <[email protected]>
> ---
> Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst
> b/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst
> index 59a332509dcd97..30f2844c3d9e5e 100644
> --- a/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/filesystems/bcachefs/future/idle_work.rst
> @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
> -Idle/background work classes design doc:
> +Idle/background work classes desiderata
> +=======================================
I agree with the underline change and tested it. However, I don't care
for the change in the wording.
>
> Right now, our behaviour at idle isn't ideal, it was designed for servers
> that
> would be under sustained load, to keep pending work at a "medium" level, to
>
> base-commit: 37c52167b007d9d0bb8c5ed53dd6efc4969a1356
Tested-by: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
--
~Randy
