On Thu 15-09-16 14:54:53, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> We want page to be isolated from the rest of the system before spliting
> it. We rely on page count to be 2 for file pages to make sure nobody
> uses the page: one pin to caller, one to radix-tree.
> 
> Filesystems with backing storage can have page count increased if it has
> buffers.
> 
> Let's try to free them, before attempt split. And remove one guarding
> VM_BUG_ON_PAGE().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shute...@linux.intel.com>
...
> @@ -2041,6 +2041,23 @@ int split_huge_page_to_list(struct page *page, struct 
> list_head *list)
>                       goto out;
>               }
>  
> +             /* Try to free buffers before attempt split */
> +             if (!PageSwapBacked(head) && PagePrivate(page)) {
> +                     /*
> +                      * We cannot trigger writeback from here due possible
> +                      * recursion if triggered from vmscan, only wait.
> +                      *
> +                      * Caller can trigger writeback it on its own, if safe.
> +                      */
> +                     wait_on_page_writeback(head);
> +
> +                     if (page_has_buffers(head) &&
> +                                     !try_to_free_buffers(head)) {
> +                             ret = -EBUSY;
> +                             goto out;
> +                     }

Shouldn't you rather use try_to_release_page() here? Because filesystems
have their ->releasepage() callbacks for freeing data associated with a
page. It is not guaranteed page private data are buffers although it is
true for ext4...

                                                                Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <j...@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to