On 01/11/2017 10:40 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> This adds a set of hooks that intercepts the blk-mq path of
> allocating/inserting/issuing/completing requests, allowing
> us to develop a scheduler within that framework.
>
> We reuse the existing elevator scheduler API on the registration
> side, but augment that with the scheduler flagging support for
> the blk-mq interfce, and with a separate set of ops hooks for MQ
> devices.
>
> We split driver and scheduler tags, so we can run the scheduling
> independent of device queue depth.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <ax...@fb.com>
[ .. ]
> @@ -823,6 +847,35 @@ static inline unsigned int queued_to_index(unsigned int
> queued)
> return min(BLK_MQ_MAX_DISPATCH_ORDER - 1, ilog2(queued) + 1);
> }
>
> +static bool blk_mq_get_driver_tag(struct request *rq,
> + struct blk_mq_hw_ctx **hctx, bool wait)
> +{
> + struct blk_mq_alloc_data data = {
> + .q = rq->q,
> + .ctx = rq->mq_ctx,
> + .hctx = blk_mq_map_queue(rq->q, rq->mq_ctx->cpu),
> + .flags = wait ? 0 : BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT,
> + };
> +
> + if (blk_mq_hctx_stopped(data.hctx))
> + return false;
> +
> + if (rq->tag != -1) {
> +done:
> + if (hctx)
> + *hctx = data.hctx;
> + return true;
> + }
> +
> + rq->tag = blk_mq_get_tag(&data);
> + if (rq->tag >= 0) {
> + data.hctx->tags->rqs[rq->tag] = rq;
> + goto done;
> + }
> +
> + return false;
> +}
> +
What happens with the existing request at 'rqs[rq->tag]' ?
Surely there is one already, right?
Things like '->init_request' assume a fully populated array, so moving
one entry to another location is ... interesting.
I would have thought we need to do a request cloning here,
otherwise this would introduce a memory leak, right?
(Not to mention a potential double completion, as the request is now at
two positions in the array)
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking
h...@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-block" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
