On 02/22/2017 12:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> + if (!lock_held) >> + mutex_lock(&dev->dev_lock); > > No conditional locking, please. I guess I causesd this by asking you > to remove __opal_lock_unlock, but it seems we'd either need to keep it > in the end. > > Except for that the series looks fine to me. > > Jens: given that 1-3 are the important fixes how about you pick those > up ASAP? They all also had my Reviewed-by for previous postings. > Thanks
I'll respin just 4/4 shortly with __opal_lock_unlock
