On 03/24/2017 01:36 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> Without the barrier, reading DEAD flag of .q_usage_counter
> and reading .mq_freeze_depth may be reordered, then the
> following wait_event_interruptible() may never return.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leim...@gmail.com>
> ---
>  block/blk-core.c | 8 ++++++++
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
> index ad388d5e309a..44eed17319c0 100644
> --- a/block/blk-core.c
> +++ b/block/blk-core.c
> @@ -669,6 +669,14 @@ int blk_queue_enter(struct request_queue *q, bool nowait)
>               if (nowait)
>                       return -EBUSY;
>  
> +             /*
> +              * read pair of barrier in blk_mq_freeze_queue_start(),
> +              * we need to order reading DEAD flag of .q_usage_counter
> +              * and reading .mq_freeze_depth, otherwise the following
> +              * wait may never return if the two read are reordered.
> +              */
> +             smp_rmb();
> +
>               ret = wait_event_interruptible(q->mq_freeze_wq,
>                               !atomic_read(&q->mq_freeze_depth) ||
>                               blk_queue_dying(q));
> 
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.com>

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                   zSeries & Storage
h...@suse.de                          +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: J. Hawn, J. Guild, F. Imendörffer, HRB 16746 (AG Nürnberg)

Reply via email to