On Sat, 2017-04-29 at 18:35 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 06:09:40PM +0000, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> > On Fri, 2017-04-28 at 23:15 +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > +static inline bool blk_mq_sched_may_use_hw_tag(struct request_queue *q)
> > > +{
> > > + if (q->tag_set->flags & BLK_MQ_F_TAG_SHARED)
> > > + return false;
> > > +
> > > + if (blk_mq_get_queue_depth(q) < q->nr_requests)
> > > + return false;
> > > +
> > > + return true;
> > > +}
> >
> > The only user of shared tag sets I know of is scsi-mq. I think it's really
> > unfortunate that this patch systematically disables
> > BLK_MQ_F_SCHED_USE_HW_TAG
> > for scsi-mq.
>
> In previous patch, I actually allow driver to pass this flag, but this
> feature is dropped in this post, just for making it simple & clean.
> If you think we need it for shared tag set, I can add it in v1.
>
> For shared tag sets, I suggest to not enable it at default, because
> scheduler is per request queue now, and generaly more requests available,
> better it performs. When tags are shared among several request
> queues, one of them may use tags up for its own scheduling, then
> starve others. But it should be possible and not difficult to allocate
> requests fairly for scheduling in this case if we switch to per-hctx
> scheduling.
Hello Ming,
Have you noticed that there is already a mechanism in the block layer to
avoid starvation if a tag set is shared? The hctx_may_queue() function
guarantees that each user that shares a tag set gets at least some tags.
The .active_queues counter keeps track of the number of hardware queues
that share a tag set.
Bart.
