On 05/24/2017 02:33 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > After the patch that introduced this function was posted on the > linux-scsi mailing list an explanation was posted why this patch > is correct. Since that explanation contains important information, > add a summary of it above the code that explanation applies to. > See also http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-scsi/msg106326.html. > > References: e494f6a72839 ("[SCSI] improve eh timeout handler") > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanass...@sandisk.com> > Cc: Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.de> > --- > drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c > index ac3196420435..19cafa3efb17 100644 > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c > @@ -116,6 +116,12 @@ static int scsi_host_eh_past_deadline(struct Scsi_Host > *shost) > /** > * scmd_eh_abort_handler - Handle command aborts > * @work: command to be aborted. > + * > + * Note: this function must be called only for a command that has timed out. > + * Because the block layer sets REQ_ATOM_COMPLETE before it calls > + * scsi_times_out(), any .scsi_done() calls from the LLD for commands that > + * have timed out do not have any effect. Hence it is safe to call > + * scsi_finish_command() from this function. > */ > void > scmd_eh_abort_handler(struct work_struct *work) > Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.com>
Cheers, Hannes -- Dr. Hannes Reinecke Teamlead Storage & Networking h...@suse.de +49 911 74053 688 SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
