On Sat, 3 Jun 2017, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> +bool irq_affinity_set(int irq, struct irq_desc *desc, const cpumask_t *mask)
> +{
> + struct irq_data *data = irq_desc_get_irq_data(desc);
> + struct irq_chip *chip = irq_data_get_irq_chip(data);
> + bool ret = false;
> +
> + if (!irq_can_move_pcntxt(data) && chip->irq_mask)
> + chip->irq_mask(data);
> +
> + if (chip->irq_set_affinity) {
> + if (chip->irq_set_affinity(data, mask, true) == -ENOSPC)
> + pr_crit("IRQ %d set affinity failed because there are
> no available vectors. The device assigned to this IRQ is unstable.\n", irq);
> + ret = true;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * We unmask if the irq was not marked masked by the core code.
> + * That respects the lazy irq disable behaviour.
> + */
> + if (!irq_can_move_pcntxt(data) &&
> + !irqd_irq_masked(data) && chip->irq_unmask)
> + chip->irq_unmask(data);
There is another issue with this. Nothing updates the affinity mask in
irq_desc, when we just invoke the chip callback. Let me have a look.
Thanks,
tglx
