On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 08:40:11AM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote: > On 06/16/2017 07:58 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >> >From my perspective, all I really care about is the 4 hints. It's a > >> simple enough interface that applications can understand and use it, and > >> we don't need any management of actual stream IDs. I think that has the > >> highest chance of success. Modifying an application to use it is > >> trivial, even something like RocksDB (if you havehad to make changes > >> to RocksDB, you'll get this). > > > > Btw, are your current RocksDB patches available somewhere? > > Yep, it's on Mark Callaghan's github: > > https://github.com/mdcallag/rocksdb > > This is using mostly the v1 I posted, the only difference is that I just > named the four flags RWF_S[1-4].
That commits look a bit like mess, but I guess I shouldn't expect kernel-style changelogs and patch separation on github :)
