On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 01:44:44PM -0400, Jeff Layton wrote: > In order to query for errors with errseq_t, you need a previously- > sampled point from which to check. When you call > filemap_write_and_wait_range though you don't have a struct file and so > no previously-sampled value.
So can we simply introduce variants of them that take a struct file? That would be: a) less churn b) less code c) less chance to get data integrity wrong
