On Wed, Jul 26, 2017 at 01:12:28PM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 06:02:29PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: > > As is done in zram_rw_page, pmem_rw_page, and btt_rw_page, don't > > call page_endio in the error case since do_mpage_readpage and > > __mpage_writepage will resubmit on error. Calling page_endio in the > > error case leads to double completion. > > > > Cc: Jens Axboe <ax...@kernel.dk> > > Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawil...@microsoft.com> > > Cc: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwis...@linux.intel.com> > > Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.willi...@intel.com> > > --- > > Noticed this while looking at unrelated brd code... > > And the real question would be: where would we see any real life impact > of just removing brd_rw_page?
I've got patches ready that remove rw_page from brd, btt and pmem. I'll send out once I'm done regression testing.
