On Thu, Aug 17, 2017 at 04:23:11PM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <[email protected]> > Cc: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <[email protected]> > Cc: Roger Pau Monn303251 <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected] > --- > drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c > index 98e34e4c62b8..270019e3e5d8 100644 > --- a/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c > +++ b/drivers/block/xen-blkfront.c > @@ -2456,7 +2456,7 @@ static void blkback_changed(struct xenbus_device *dev, > case XenbusStateClosed: > if (dev->state == XenbusStateClosed) > break; > - /* Missed the backend's Closing state -- fallthrough */ > + /* fall through */
This is losing information present in the original comment. Would splitting the comment into two make gcc happy? Roger.
