> On 21 Sep 2017, at 13.26, Rakesh Pandit <rak...@tuxera.com> wrote:
> 
> It seems pblk_dealloc_page would race against pblk_alloc_pages for
> line bitmap for sector allocation.  The chances are very low but might
> as well protect the bitmap properly.  It's not even in fast path.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rakesh Pandit <rak...@tuxera.com>
> ---
> drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c
> index a230125..b92eabc 100644
> --- a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c
> @@ -502,12 +502,14 @@ void pblk_dealloc_page(struct pblk *pblk, struct 
> pblk_line *line, int nr_secs)
>       u64 addr;
>       int i;
> 
> +     spin_lock(&line->lock);
>       addr = find_next_zero_bit(line->map_bitmap,
>                                       pblk->lm.sec_per_line, line->cur_sec);
>       line->cur_sec = addr - nr_secs;
> 
>       for (i = 0; i < nr_secs; i++, line->cur_sec--)
>               WARN_ON(!test_and_clear_bit(line->cur_sec, line->map_bitmap));
> +     spin_lock(&line->lock);

Changed this to spin_unlock() when picking it up.

Javier.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Reply via email to