On Mon, Jan 08, 2018 at 11:17:38AM -0700, Logan Gunthorpe wrote: > >>If at all it should be in the dma_map* wrappers, but for that we'd need > >>a good identifier. And it still would not solve the whole fake dma > >>ops issue. > > > >Very long term the IOMMUs under the ops will need to care about this, > >so the wrapper is not an optimal place to put it - but I wouldn't > >object if it gets it out of RDMA :) > > Well, creating the extra op doesn't really change anything to the RDMA patch > in this series.
Not fundamentally, but it lets us solve the bugs the patch introduces with hfi/etc > The point is, for the time being, we need to track whether we are > doing a P2P or normal mapping using a side channel as we don't have > a good way of tracking it in the SGL at this time. Well, that is disappointing for now, but I'm OK with the flag in the RW interface - as long as we all sort of agree it is not desirable and the SG should self-identify in an ideal someday future world.. Jason
