On Tue, 2018-01-09 at 07:41 +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote: > I'm always a bit cautious when having rcu_read_lock() and > rcu_read_unlock() in two separate functions. > Can we make this dependency more explicit by renaming the first function > to blk_start_wait_if_quiesced() and updating the comment to the effect > that both functions must be used in tandem?
Hello Hannes, That sounds like a good idea to me. I will make these changes and repost this patch series. Bart.
