On 01/14/2018 03:42 PM, Coly Li wrote:
> In patch "bcache: fix cached_dev->count usage for bch_cache_set_error()",
> cached_dev_get() is called when creating dc->writeback_thread, and
> cached_dev_put() is called when exiting dc->writeback_thread. This
> modification works well unless people detach the bcache device manually by
>     'echo 1 > /sys/block/bcache<N>/bcache/detach'
> Because this sysfs interface only calls bch_cached_dev_detach() which wakes
> up dc->writeback_thread but does not stop it. The reason is, before patch
> "bcache: fix cached_dev->count usage for bch_cache_set_error()", inside
> bch_writeback_thread(), if cache is not dirty after writeback,
> cached_dev_put() will be called here. And in cached_dev_make_request() when
> a new write request makes cache from clean to dirty, cached_dev_get() will
> be called there. Since we don't operate dc->count in these locations,
> refcount d->count cannot be dropped after cache becomes clean, and
> cached_dev_detach_finish() won't be called to detach bcache device.
> 
> This patch fixes the issue by checking whether BCACHE_DEV_DETACHING is
> set inside bch_writeback_thread(). If this bit is set and cache is clean
> (no existing writeback_keys), break the while-loop, call cached_dev_put()
> and quit the writeback thread.
> 
> Please note if cache is still dirty, even BCACHE_DEV_DETACHING is set the
> writeback thread should continue to perform writeback, this is the original
> design of manually detach.
> 
> I compose a separte patch because that patch "bcache: fix cached_dev->count
> usage for bch_cache_set_error()" already gets a "Reviewed-by:" from Hannes
> Reinecke. Also this fix is not trivial and good for a separate patch.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Coly Li <col...@suse.de>
> Cc: Michael Lyle <ml...@lyle.org>
> Cc: Hannes Reinecke <h...@suse.com>
> Cc: Huijun Tang <tang.jun...@zte.com.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c | 20 +++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
> index b280c134dd4d..4dbeaaa575bf 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/writeback.c
> @@ -565,9 +565,15 @@ static int bch_writeback_thread(void *arg)
>       while (!kthread_should_stop()) {
>               down_write(&dc->writeback_lock);
>               set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
> -             if (!atomic_read(&dc->has_dirty) ||
> -                 (!test_bit(BCACHE_DEV_DETACHING, &dc->disk.flags) &&
> -                  !dc->writeback_running)) {
> +             /*
> +              * If the bache device is detaching, skip here and continue
> +              * to perform writeback. Otherwise, if no dirty data on cache,
> +              * or there is dirty data on cache but writeback is disabled,
> +              * the writeback thread should sleep here and wait for others
> +              * to wake up it.
> +              */
> +             if (!test_bit(BCACHE_DEV_DETACHING, &dc->disk.flags) &&
> +                 (!atomic_read(&dc->has_dirty) || !dc->writeback_running)) {
>                       up_write(&dc->writeback_lock);
>  
>                       if (kthread_should_stop()) {
> @@ -587,6 +593,14 @@ static int bch_writeback_thread(void *arg)
>                       atomic_set(&dc->has_dirty, 0);
>                       SET_BDEV_STATE(&dc->sb, BDEV_STATE_CLEAN);
>                       bch_write_bdev_super(dc, NULL);
> +                     /*
> +                      * If bcache device is detaching via sysfs interface,
> +                      * writeback thread should stop after there is no dirty
> +                      * data on cache. BCACHE_DEV_DETACHING flag is set in
> +                      * bch_cached_dev_detach().
> +                      */
> +                     if (test_bit(BCACHE_DEV_DETACHING, &dc->disk.flags))
> +                             break;
>               }
>  
>               up_write(&dc->writeback_lock);
> 
Checking several atomic flags in one statement renders the atomic pretty
much pointless; you need to protect the 'if' clause with some lock or
just check _one_ atomic statement.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Teamlead Storage & Networking
h...@suse.de                                   +49 911 74053 688
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: F. Imendörffer, J. Smithard, J. Guild, D. Upmanyu, G. Norton
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)

Reply via email to