On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 10:14:04AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello, Omar.
>
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 02:14:44PM -0800, Omar Sandoval wrote:
> > > wake_index = atomic_read(&sbq->wake_index);
> > > for (i = 0; i < SBQ_WAIT_QUEUES; i++) {
> > > struct sbq_wait_state *ws = &sbq->ws[wake_index];
> >
> > So I think we want a patch for the test_and_set_bit_lock() and
> > clear_bit_unlock(), but the rest should stay as-is.
>
> Yeah, that makes sense to me. Would you be interested in updating the
> patch?
Yup, I'll send it up. Thanks, Tejun!
