FWIW, this patch does not fix the issue for me:
ostname=? addr=? terminal=? res=success'
[ 21.454961] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1882 at block/blk-mq.c:1410
__blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0xbe/0xd8
[ 21.454968] Modules linked in: scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_emc scsi_dh_alua
dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_multipath dm_mod autofs4
[ 21.454984] CPU: 3 PID: 1882 Comm: dasdconf.sh Not tainted 4.16.0-rc7+ #26
[ 21.454987] Hardware name: IBM 2964 NC9 704 (LPAR)
[ 21.454990] Krnl PSW : 00000000c0131ea3 000000003ea2f7bf
(__blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0xbe/0xd8)
[ 21.454996] R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3 CC:0 PM:0
RI:0 EA:3
[ 21.455005] Krnl GPRS: 0000013abb69a000 0000013a00000000 0000013ac6c0dc00
0000000000000001
[ 21.455008] 0000000000000000 0000013abb69a710 0000013a00000000
00000001b691fd98
[ 21.455011] 00000001b691fd98 0000013ace4775c8 0000000000000001
0000000000000000
[ 21.455014] 0000013ac6c0dc00 0000000000b47238 00000001b691fc08
00000001b691fbd0
[ 21.455032] Krnl Code: 000000000069c596: ebaff0a00004 lmg
%r10,%r15,160(%r15)
000000000069c59c: c0f4ffff7a5e brcl
15,68ba58
#000000000069c5a2: a7f40001 brc
15,69c5a4
>000000000069c5a6: e340f0c00004 lg
%r4,192(%r15)
000000000069c5ac: ebaff0a00004 lmg
%r10,%r15,160(%r15)
000000000069c5b2: 07f4 bcr 15,%r4
000000000069c5b4: c0e5fffffeea brasl
%r14,69c388
000000000069c5ba: a7f4fff6 brc
15,69c5a6
[ 21.455067] Call Trace:
[ 21.455072] ([<00000001b691fd98>] 0x1b691fd98)
[ 21.455079] [<000000000069c692>] blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0xba/0x100
[ 21.455083] [<000000000069c740>] blk_mq_run_hw_queues+0x68/0x88
[ 21.455089] [<000000000069b956>] __blk_mq_complete_request+0x11e/0x1d8
[ 21.455091] [<000000000069ba9c>] blk_mq_complete_request+0x8c/0xc8
[ 21.455103] [<00000000008aa250>] dasd_block_tasklet+0x158/0x490
[ 21.455110] [<000000000014c742>] tasklet_hi_action+0x92/0x120
[ 21.455118] [<0000000000a7cfc0>] __do_softirq+0x120/0x348
[ 21.455122] [<000000000014c212>] irq_exit+0xba/0xd0
[ 21.455130] [<000000000010bf92>] do_IRQ+0x8a/0xb8
[ 21.455133] [<0000000000a7c298>] io_int_handler+0x130/0x298
[ 21.455136] Last Breaking-Event-Address:
[ 21.455138] [<000000000069c5a2>] __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0xba/0xd8
[ 21.455140] ---[ end trace be43f99a5d1e553e ]---
[ 21.510046] dasdconf.sh Warning: 0.0.241e is already online, not configuring
On 03/28/2018 05:22 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On 3/27/18 7:20 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
>> From commit 20e4d813931961fe ("blk-mq: simplify queue mapping & schedule
>> with each possisble CPU") on, it should be easier to see unmapped hctx
>> in some CPU topo, such as, hctx may not be mapped to any CPU.
>>
>> This patch avoids the warning in __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue() by
>> checking if the hctx is mapped in blk_mq_run_hw_queues().
>>
>> blk_mq_run_hw_queues() is often run in SCSI or some driver's completion
>> path, so this warning has to be addressed.
>
> I don't like this very much. You're catching just one particular case,
> and if the hw queue has pending IO (for instance), then it's just wrong.
>
> How about something like the below? Totally untested...
>
> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
> index 16e83e6df404..4c04ac124e5d 100644
> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
> @@ -1307,6 +1307,14 @@ static void __blk_mq_run_hw_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx
> *hctx)
> int srcu_idx;
>
> /*
> + * Warn if the queue isn't mapped AND we have pending IO. Not being
> + * mapped isn't necessarily a huge issue, if we don't have pending IO.
> + */
> + if (!blk_mq_hw_queue_mapped(hctx) &&
> + !WARN_ON_ONCE(blk_mq_hctx_has_pending(hctx)))
> + return;
> +
> + /*
> * We should be running this queue from one of the CPUs that
> * are mapped to it.
> *
>
