On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 12:10:11PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
>
>
> On 03/29/2018 11:40 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 29, 2018 at 11:09:08AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 03/29/2018 09:23 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 03/29/2018 04:00 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 05:36:53PM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On 03/28/2018 05:26 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> >>>>>> Hi Christian,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 09:45:10AM +0200, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
> >>>>>>> FWIW, this patch does not fix the issue for me:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> ostname=? addr=? terminal=? res=success'
> >>>>>>> [ 21.454961] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1882 at block/blk-mq.c:1410
> >>>>>>> __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0xbe/0xd8
> >>>>>>> [ 21.454968] Modules linked in: scsi_dh_rdac scsi_dh_emc
> >>>>>>> scsi_dh_alua dm_mirror dm_region_hash dm_log dm_multipath dm_mod
> >>>>>>> autofs4
> >>>>>>> [ 21.454984] CPU: 3 PID: 1882 Comm: dasdconf.sh Not tainted
> >>>>>>> 4.16.0-rc7+ #26
> >>>>>>> [ 21.454987] Hardware name: IBM 2964 NC9 704 (LPAR)
> >>>>>>> [ 21.454990] Krnl PSW : 00000000c0131ea3 000000003ea2f7bf
> >>>>>>> (__blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0xbe/0xd8)
> >>>>>>> [ 21.454996] R:0 T:1 IO:0 EX:0 Key:0 M:1 W:0 P:0 AS:3
> >>>>>>> CC:0 PM:0 RI:0 EA:3
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455005] Krnl GPRS: 0000013abb69a000 0000013a00000000
> >>>>>>> 0000013ac6c0dc00 0000000000000001
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455008] 0000000000000000 0000013abb69a710
> >>>>>>> 0000013a00000000 00000001b691fd98
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455011] 00000001b691fd98 0000013ace4775c8
> >>>>>>> 0000000000000001 0000000000000000
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455014] 0000013ac6c0dc00 0000000000b47238
> >>>>>>> 00000001b691fc08 00000001b691fbd0
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455032] Krnl Code: 000000000069c596: ebaff0a00004 lmg
> >>>>>>> %r10,%r15,160(%r15)
> >>>>>>> 000000000069c59c: c0f4ffff7a5e brcl
> >>>>>>> 15,68ba58
> >>>>>>> #000000000069c5a2: a7f40001 brc
> >>>>>>> 15,69c5a4
> >>>>>>> >000000000069c5a6: e340f0c00004 lg
> >>>>>>> %r4,192(%r15)
> >>>>>>> 000000000069c5ac: ebaff0a00004 lmg
> >>>>>>> %r10,%r15,160(%r15)
> >>>>>>> 000000000069c5b2: 07f4 bcr
> >>>>>>> 15,%r4
> >>>>>>> 000000000069c5b4: c0e5fffffeea brasl
> >>>>>>> %r14,69c388
> >>>>>>> 000000000069c5ba: a7f4fff6 brc
> >>>>>>> 15,69c5a6
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455067] Call Trace:
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455072] ([<00000001b691fd98>] 0x1b691fd98)
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455079] [<000000000069c692>] blk_mq_run_hw_queue+0xba/0x100
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455083] [<000000000069c740>] blk_mq_run_hw_queues+0x68/0x88
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455089] [<000000000069b956>]
> >>>>>>> __blk_mq_complete_request+0x11e/0x1d8
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455091] [<000000000069ba9c>]
> >>>>>>> blk_mq_complete_request+0x8c/0xc8
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455103] [<00000000008aa250>] dasd_block_tasklet+0x158/0x490
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455110] [<000000000014c742>] tasklet_hi_action+0x92/0x120
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455118] [<0000000000a7cfc0>] __do_softirq+0x120/0x348
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455122] [<000000000014c212>] irq_exit+0xba/0xd0
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455130] [<000000000010bf92>] do_IRQ+0x8a/0xb8
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455133] [<0000000000a7c298>] io_int_handler+0x130/0x298
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455136] Last Breaking-Event-Address:
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455138] [<000000000069c5a2>]
> >>>>>>> __blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue+0xba/0xd8
> >>>>>>> [ 21.455140] ---[ end trace be43f99a5d1e553e ]---
> >>>>>>> [ 21.510046] dasdconf.sh Warning: 0.0.241e is already online, not
> >>>>>>> configuring
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thinking about this issue further, I can't understand the root cause
> >>>>>> for
> >>>>>> this issue.
> >>
> >> FWIW, Limiting CONFIG_NR_CPUS to 64 seems to make the problem go away.
> >
> > I think the following patch is needed, and this way aligns to the mapping
> > created via managed IRQ at least.
> >
> > diff --git a/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c b/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
> > index 9f8cffc8a701..638ab5c11b3c 100644
> > --- a/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
> > +++ b/block/blk-mq-cpumap.c
> > @@ -14,13 +14,12 @@
> > #include "blk.h"
> > #include "blk-mq.h"
> >
> > +/*
> > + * Given there isn't CPU hotplug handler in blk-mq, map all possible CPUs
> > to
> > + * queues even it isn't present yet.
> > + */
> > static int cpu_to_queue_index(unsigned int nr_queues, const int cpu)
> > {
> > - /*
> > - * Non present CPU will be mapped to queue index 0.
> > - */
> > - if (!cpu_present(cpu))
> > - return 0;
> > return cpu % nr_queues;
> > }
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ming
> >
>
> With that I no longer see the WARN_ON but the other warning instead:
>
> [ 31.903096] audit: type=1130 audit(1522318064.439:41): pid=1 uid=0
> auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='unit=systemd-tmpfiles-setup-dev
> comm="systemd" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? addr=? terminal=?
> res=success'
> [ 31.903100] audit: type=1131 audit(1522318064.439:42): pid=1 uid=0
> auid=4294967295 ses=4294967295 msg='unit=systemd-tmpfiles-setup-dev
> comm="systemd" exe="/usr/lib/systemd/systemd" hostname=? addr=? terminal=?
> res=success'
> [ 31.985756] systemd-journald[379]: Received SIGTERM from PID 1 (systemd).
> [ 32.000543] systemd: 18 output lines suppressed due to ratelimiting
> [ 32.209496] EXT4-fs (dasdc1): re-mounted. Opts: (null)
> [ 32.234808] systemd-journald[2490]: Received request to flush runtime
> journal from PID 1
> [ 32.359832] tun: Universal TUN/TAP device driver, 1.6
> [ 32.470841] run queue from wrong CPU 18, hctx active
But your 'lscpu' log showed that you only have 16 CPUs online(0~15) and
you also said CPU hotplug isn't involved in your test, so I am just
wondering where the CPU 18 is from?
Thanks,
Ming
