On Fri 20-04-18 16:59:03, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> thaw_super_locked() was added via commit 08fdc8a0138a ("buffer.c: call
> thaw_super during emergency thaw") merged on v4.17 to help with the
> ability so that the caller can take charge of handling the s_umount lock,
> however, it has left all* of the failure handling including unlocking
> lock of s_umount inside thaw_super_locked().
> 
> This does not make thaw_super_locked() flexible. For instance we may
> later want to use it with the abilty to handle unfolding of the locks
> ourselves.
> 
> Change thaw_super_locked() to really just be a helper, and let the
> callers deal with all the error handling.

And do you have use for the new thaw_super_locked()? Because the new
semantics with having to deal with deactivate_locked_super() does not seem
ideal either so as a standalone cleanup patch it does not look too
useful.
 
> This commit introeuces no functional changes.
                ^^^ introduces
 
                                                                Honza

> ---
>  fs/super.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/super.c b/fs/super.c
> index 9d0eb5e20a1f..82bc74a16f06 100644
> --- a/fs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/super.c
> @@ -937,10 +937,15 @@ void emergency_remount(void)
>  
>  static void do_thaw_all_callback(struct super_block *sb)
>  {
> +     int error;
> +
>       down_write(&sb->s_umount);
>       if (sb->s_root && sb->s_flags & MS_BORN) {
>               emergency_thaw_bdev(sb);
> -             thaw_super_locked(sb);
> +             error = thaw_super_locked(sb);
> +             if (error)
> +                     up_write(&sb->s_umount);
> +             deactivate_locked_super(sb);
>       } else {
>               up_write(&sb->s_umount);
>       }
> @@ -1532,14 +1537,13 @@ int freeze_super(struct super_block *sb)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(freeze_super);
>  
> +/* Caller takes the sb->s_umount rw_semaphore lock and handles active count 
> */
>  static int thaw_super_locked(struct super_block *sb)
>  {
>       int error;
>  
> -     if (sb->s_writers.frozen != SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE) {
> -             up_write(&sb->s_umount);
> +     if (sb->s_writers.frozen != SB_FREEZE_COMPLETE)
>               return -EINVAL;
> -     }
>  
>       if (sb_rdonly(sb)) {
>               sb->s_writers.frozen = SB_UNFROZEN;
> @@ -1554,7 +1558,6 @@ static int thaw_super_locked(struct super_block *sb)
>                       printk(KERN_ERR
>                               "VFS:Filesystem thaw failed\n");
>                       lockdep_sb_freeze_release(sb);
> -                     up_write(&sb->s_umount);
>                       return error;
>               }
>       }
> @@ -1563,7 +1566,6 @@ static int thaw_super_locked(struct super_block *sb)
>       sb_freeze_unlock(sb);
>  out:
>       wake_up(&sb->s_writers.wait_unfrozen);
> -     deactivate_locked_super(sb);
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> @@ -1575,7 +1577,18 @@ static int thaw_super_locked(struct super_block *sb)
>   */
>  int thaw_super(struct super_block *sb)
>  {
> +     int error;
> +
>       down_write(&sb->s_umount);
> -     return thaw_super_locked(sb);
> +     error = thaw_super_locked(sb);
> +     if (error) {
> +             up_write(&sb->s_umount);
> +             goto out;
> +     }
> +
> +     deactivate_locked_super(sb);
> +
> +out:
> +     return error;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(thaw_super);
> -- 
> 2.16.3
> 
-- 
Jan Kara <j...@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

Reply via email to