On Wed, May 09, 2018 at 11:59:38AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 05:01:34PM -0400, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/psi_types.h b/include/linux/psi_types.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..b22b0ffc729d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/include/linux/psi_types.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
> > +#ifndef _LINUX_PSI_TYPES_H
> > +#define _LINUX_PSI_TYPES_H
> > +
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PSI
> > +
> > +/* Tracked task states */
> > +enum psi_task_count {
> > + NR_RUNNING,
> > + NR_IOWAIT,
> > + NR_MEMSTALL,
> > + NR_PSI_TASK_COUNTS,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* Task state bitmasks */
> > +#define TSK_RUNNING (1 << NR_RUNNING)
> > +#define TSK_IOWAIT (1 << NR_IOWAIT)
> > +#define TSK_MEMSTALL (1 << NR_MEMSTALL)
> > +
> > +/* Resources that workloads could be stalled on */
> > +enum psi_res {
> > + PSI_CPU,
> > + PSI_MEM,
> > + PSI_IO,
> > + NR_PSI_RESOURCES,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* Pressure states for a group of tasks */
> > +enum psi_state {
> > + PSI_NONE, /* No stalled tasks */
> > + PSI_SOME, /* Stalled tasks & working tasks */
> > + PSI_FULL, /* Stalled tasks & no working tasks */
> > + NR_PSI_STATES,
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct psi_resource {
> > + /* Current pressure state for this resource */
> > + enum psi_state state;
> > +
> > + /* Start of current state (cpu_clock) */
> > + u64 state_start;
> > +
> > + /* Time sampling buckets for pressure states (ns) */
> > + u64 times[NR_PSI_STATES - 1];
>
> Fails to explain why no FULL.
It's NONE that's excluded. I'll add a comment.
> > +struct psi_group_cpu {
> > + /* States of the tasks belonging to this group */
> > + unsigned int tasks[NR_PSI_TASK_COUNTS];
> > +
>
> AFAICT there's a hole here, that would fit the @nonidle member. Which
> also avoids the later hole generated by it.
Good spot, I'll reshuffle this accordingly.
> > + /* Per-resource pressure tracking in this group */
> > + struct psi_resource res[NR_PSI_RESOURCES];
> > +
> > + /* There are runnable or D-state tasks */
> > + bool nonidle;
>
> Mandatory complaint about using _Bool in composites goes here.
int it is.
Thanks
