On 11/2/18 8:59 AM, Ming Lei wrote: > Hi Jens, > > As I mentioned, there are at least two issues in the patch of ' > irq: add support for allocating (and affinitizing) sets of IRQs': > > 1) it is wrong to pass 'mask + usedvec' to irq_build_affinity_masks() > > 2) we should spread all possible CPUs in 2-stage way on each set of IRQs > > The fix isn't trivial, and I introduce two extra patches as preparation, > then the implementation can be more clean. > > The patchset is against mq-maps branch of block tree, feel free to > integrate into the whole patchset of multiple queue maps.
Thanks Ming, I ran this through my testing, and I end up with the same maps and affinities for all the cases I cared about. I'm going to drop my initial version, and add the three. -- Jens Axboe
