On 1/16/19 1:53 PM, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:50:00AM -0700, Jens Axboe wrote: >> If we have fixed user buffers, we can map them into the kernel when we >> setup the io_context. That avoids the need to do get_user_pages() for >> each and every IO. > ..... >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + } while (atomic_long_cmpxchg(&ctx->user->locked_vm, cur_pages, >> + new_pages) != cur_pages); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int io_sqe_buffer_unregister(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx) >> +{ >> + int i, j; >> + >> + if (!ctx->user_bufs) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + for (i = 0; i < ctx->sq_entries; i++) { >> + struct io_mapped_ubuf *imu = &ctx->user_bufs[i]; >> + >> + for (j = 0; j < imu->nr_bvecs; j++) { >> + set_page_dirty_lock(imu->bvec[j].bv_page); >> + put_page(imu->bvec[j].bv_page); >> + } > > Hmmm, so we call set_page_dirty() when the gup reference is dropped... > > ..... > >> +static int io_sqe_buffer_register(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx, void __user *arg, >> + unsigned nr_args) >> +{ > > ..... > >> + down_write(¤t->mm->mmap_sem); >> + pret = get_user_pages_longterm(ubuf, nr_pages, FOLL_WRITE, >> + pages, NULL); >> + up_write(¤t->mm->mmap_sem); > > Thought so. This has the same problem as RDMA w.r.t. using > file-backed mappings for the user buffer. It is not synchronised > against truncate, hole punches, async page writeback cleaning the > page, etc, and so can lead to data corruption and/or kernel panics. > > It also can't be used with DAX because the above problems are > actually a user-after-free of storage space, not just a dangling > page reference that can be cleaned up after the gup pin is dropped. > > Perhaps, at least until we solve the GUP problems w.r.t. file backed > pages and/or add and require file layout leases for these reference, > we should error out if the user buffer pages are file-backed > mappings?
Thanks for taking a look at this. I'd be fine with that restriction, especially since it can get relaxed down the line. Do we have an appropriate API for this? And why isn't get_user_pages_longterm() that exact API already? Would seem that most (all?) callers of this API is currently broken then. -- Jens Axboe