On 25/03/2019 02:04, kernel test robot wrote:
[...]
> nvme/005 (reset local loopback target)
> runtime ...
> nvme/005 (reset local loopback target) [failed]
> runtime ... 0.596s
> something found in dmesg:
> [ 24.160182] run blktests nvme/005 at 2019-03-24 07:35:16
> [ 24.346189] nvmet: adding nsid 1 to subsystem blktests-subsystem-1
> [ 24.373089] nvmet: creating controller 1 for subsystem
> blktests-subsystem-1 for NQN
> nqn.2014-08.org.nvmexpress:uuid:dbd85962-80d1-4872-ac0f-d0214f3b1131.
> [ 24.394247] WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 881 at
> /kbuild/src/x86_64/block/blk-merge.c:608 blk_rq_map_sg+0x5f0/0x6c0
> [ 24.396082] Modules linked in: nvme_loop nvme_fabrics nvmet nvme_core
> loop crct10dif_pclmul crc32_pclmul crc32c_intel ghash_clmulni_intel
> ata_generic sd_mod pata_acpi sg bochs_drm ttm ppdev drm_kms_helper
> syscopyarea sysfillrect sysimgblt fb_sys_fops snd_pcm drm ata_piix snd_timer
> aesni_intel crypto_simd snd cryptd glue_helper libata joydev soundcore pcspkr
> serio_raw virtio_scsi i2c_piix4 parport_pc floppy parport ip_tables
> [ 24.403009] CPU: 1 PID: 881 Comm: nvme Not tainted
> 5.0.0-rc6-00148-g4e366a7 #1
> [ 24.404372] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
> BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014
> [ 24.405930] RIP: 0010:blk_rq_map_sg+0x5f0/0x6c0
> [ 24.406808] Code: 41 8b 91 10 01 00 00 8b 43 24 85 c2 0f 84 e3 fb ff
> ff f7 d0 21 d0 83 c0 01 41 01 40 0c 01 83 d0 00 00 00 e9 cd fb ff ff 0f 0b
> <0f> 0b e9 c3 fc ff ff 80 3d 66 f3 1d 01 00 0f 85 88 fb ff ff 48 c7
> [ 24.410274] RSP: 0000:ffffb95c409d7908 EFLAGS: 00010202
> ...
> (See '/lkp/benchmarks/blktests/blktests/results/nodev/nvme/005.dmesg' for
> the entire message)
OK we're tripping over this in blk_rq_map_sg():
607 /*
608 * Something must have been wrong if the figured number of
609 * segment is bigger than number of req's physical segments
610 */
611 WARN_ON(nsegs > blk_rq_nr_phys_segments(rq));
In all cases I could reproduce it I had nsegs == 2 and
rq->nr_phys_segments == 1 (rq->bio->bi_phys_segments == 1).
Adding this into nvme-loop "fixes" the issue but I don't think this is
the correct way to do
--- a/drivers/nvme/target/loop.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/target/loop.c
@@ -387,6 +387,7 @@ static int nvme_loop_configure_admin_que
goto out_free_tagset;
}
+ blk_queue_segment_boundary(ctrl->ctrl.admin_q, PAGE_SIZE - 1);
error = nvmf_connect_admin_queue(&ctrl->ctrl);
if (error)
goto out_cleanup_queue;
What raises my suspicion is this code fragment from bio_add_pc_page():
731
732 /* If we may be able to merge these biovecs, force a recount */
733 if (bio->bi_vcnt > 1 && biovec_phys_mergeable(q, bvec - 1, bvec))
734 bio->bi_phys_segments = -1;
This -1 (from this patch) would fit the one less than 'nsegs' but after
days of searching and staring at the code, I cannot find where we loose
the one. Before this patch set we would only have cleared the
BIO_SEG_VALID flag and thus we never run out of sync.
Adding a call to blk_recount_segments() doesn't do any difference here.
It can of be a read herring as well.
What makes me suspicious is the fact that I can't reliably trigger it by
running nvme/005 but have to run it in a loop ranging between several
seconds to some minutes.
Anyone any ideas? I've been staring at this for several days now but
can't find out whats wrong.
Thanks a lot,
Johannes
--
Johannes Thumshirn SUSE Labs Filesystems
jthumsh...@suse.de +49 911 74053 689
SUSE LINUX GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
GF: Felix Imendörffer, Mary Higgins, Sri Rasiah
HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
Key fingerprint = EC38 9CAB C2C4 F25D 8600 D0D0 0393 969D 2D76 0850
