On 3/29/19 10:34 PM, Martin K. Petersen wrote: > > Jens, > >> I told you this for the initial posting, and the objection still >> stands. Adding 40 bytes to struct bio is a no-go. >> >> So that's a big NAK on that series. > > I think you missed Bob's comment that this will go in the existing > bio_integrity field. I believe the main purpose of the series is to > solicit feedback on the callback approach. >
Yes, indeed!
