On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 01:57:03PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> @@ -40,10 +40,7 @@
>  static void __qib_release_user_pages(struct page **p, size_t num_pages,
>                                    int dirty)
>  {
> -     if (dirty)
> -             put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, num_pages);
> -     else
> -             put_user_pages(p, num_pages);
> +     put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, num_pages, dirty);
>  }

__qib_release_user_pages should be removed now as a direct call to
put_user_pages_dirty_lock is a lot more clear.

> index 0b0237d41613..62e6ffa9ad78 100644
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/usnic/usnic_uiom.c
> @@ -75,10 +75,7 @@ static void usnic_uiom_put_pages(struct list_head 
> *chunk_list, int dirty)
>               for_each_sg(chunk->page_list, sg, chunk->nents, i) {
>                       page = sg_page(sg);
>                       pa = sg_phys(sg);
> -                     if (dirty)
> -                             put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1);
> -                     else
> -                             put_user_page(page);
> +                     put_user_pages_dirty_lock(&page, 1, dirty);
>                       usnic_dbg("pa: %pa\n", &pa);

There is a pre-existing bug here, as this needs to use the sg_page
iterator.  Probably worth throwing in a fix into your series while you
are at it.

> @@ -63,15 +63,7 @@ struct siw_mem *siw_mem_id2obj(struct siw_device *sdev, 
> int stag_index)
>  static void siw_free_plist(struct siw_page_chunk *chunk, int num_pages,
>                          bool dirty)
>  {
> -     struct page **p = chunk->plist;
> -
> -     while (num_pages--) {
> -             if (!PageDirty(*p) && dirty)
> -                     put_user_pages_dirty_lock(p, 1);
> -             else
> -                     put_user_page(*p);
> -             p++;
> -     }
> +     put_user_pages_dirty_lock(chunk->plist, num_pages, dirty);

siw_free_plist should just go away now.

Otherwise this looks good to me.

Reply via email to