On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 09:38:17PM -0800, Gaurav Kashyap wrote:
> Add documentation for the ice-use-hwkm property in
> qcom ice.

Please describe the problem that you're solving by adding this property
to the binding (the description of hardware/firmware).

> 
> Signed-off-by: Gaurav Kashyap <quic_gaurk...@quicinc.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml         | 7 +++++++
>  1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git 
> a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml 
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml
> index ca4f7d1cefaa..93e017dddc9d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/qcom,inline-crypto-engine.yaml
> @@ -24,6 +24,13 @@ properties:
>    clocks:
>      maxItems: 1
>  
> +  qcom,ice-use-hwkm:
> +    type: boolean
> +    description:
> +      Use the supported Hardware Key Manager (HWKM) in Qualcomm
> +      ICE to support wrapped keys. This dictates if wrapped keys
> +      have to be used by ICE.

As described it sounds like software configuration, rather than a
description of the capabilities of the hardware/firmware.

In what cases would we, and would we not, specify this property?

Regards,
Bjorn

> +
>  required:
>    - compatible
>    - reg
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 
> 

Reply via email to