On Fri, Feb 21, 2025 at 04:11:03PM +0800, Zheng Qixing wrote:
> From: Li Nan <linan...@huawei.com>
> 
> The number of badblocks cannot exceed MAX_BADBLOCKS, but it should be
> allowed to equal MAX_BADBLOCKS.
> 
> Fixes: aa511ff8218b ("badblocks: switch to the improved badblock handling 
> code")
> Signed-off-by: Li Nan <linan...@huawei.com>

Looks good to me.

Acked-by: Coly Li <col...@kernel.org>

Thanks.

> ---
>  block/badblocks.c | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/block/badblocks.c b/block/badblocks.c
> index a953d2e9417f..87267bae6836 100644
> --- a/block/badblocks.c
> +++ b/block/badblocks.c
> @@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ static bool can_front_overwrite(struct badblocks *bb, int 
> prev,
>                       *extra = 2;
>       }
>  
> -     if ((bb->count + (*extra)) >= MAX_BADBLOCKS)
> +     if ((bb->count + (*extra)) > MAX_BADBLOCKS)
>               return false;
>  
>       return true;
> @@ -1135,7 +1135,7 @@ static int _badblocks_clear(struct badblocks *bb, 
> sector_t s, int sectors)
>               if ((BB_OFFSET(p[prev]) < bad.start) &&
>                   (BB_END(p[prev]) > (bad.start + bad.len))) {
>                       /* Splitting */
> -                     if ((bb->count + 1) < MAX_BADBLOCKS) {
> +                     if ((bb->count + 1) <= MAX_BADBLOCKS) {
>                               len = front_splitting_clear(bb, prev, &bad);
>                               bb->count += 1;
>                               cleared++;
> -- 
> 2.39.2
> 

-- 
Coly Li

Reply via email to