On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 01:03:31PM +0800, Qu Wenruo wrote:
> Before this patch, btrfs-convert only rely on large enough initial
> system/metadata chunk size to ensure no newer system/meta chunk will be
> created.
> 
> But that's not safe enough. So add two new members in fs_info,
> avoid_sys/meta_chunk_alloc flags to prevent any newer system or meta
> chunks to be created before init_btrfs_v2().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <[email protected]>
> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <[email protected]>
> ---
>  btrfs-convert.c |  9 +++++++++
>  ctree.h         |  3 +++
>  extent-tree.c   | 10 ++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/btrfs-convert.c b/btrfs-convert.c
> index efa3b02..333f413 100644
> --- a/btrfs-convert.c
> +++ b/btrfs-convert.c
> @@ -2322,6 +2322,13 @@ static int init_btrfs_v2(struct btrfs_mkfs_config 
> *cfg, struct btrfs_root *root,
>       struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = root->fs_info;
>       int ret;
>  
> +     /*
> +      * Don't alloc any metadata/system chunk, as we don't want
> +      * any meta/sys chunk allcated before all data chunks are inserted.
> +      * Or we screw up the chunk layout just like the old implement.
> +      */

I don't get this, with this patch set, we can allocate data from DATA chunk,
allocate metadata from METADATA chunk, but then we're not allowed to allocate 
new chunks?

Thanks,

-liubo
> +     fs_info->avoid_sys_chunk_alloc = 1;
> +     fs_info->avoid_meta_chunk_alloc = 1;
>       trans = btrfs_start_transaction(root, 1);
>       BUG_ON(!trans);
>       ret = btrfs_fix_block_accounting(trans, root);
> @@ -2359,6 +2366,8 @@ static int init_btrfs_v2(struct btrfs_mkfs_config *cfg, 
> struct btrfs_root *root,
>               goto err;
>  
>       ret = btrfs_commit_transaction(trans, root);
> +     fs_info->avoid_sys_chunk_alloc = 0;
> +     fs_info->avoid_meta_chunk_alloc = 0;
>  err:
>       return ret;
>  }
> diff --git a/ctree.h b/ctree.h
> index 1443746..187bd27 100644
> --- a/ctree.h
> +++ b/ctree.h
> @@ -1030,6 +1030,9 @@ struct btrfs_fs_info {
>       unsigned int quota_enabled:1;
>       unsigned int suppress_check_block_errors:1;
>       unsigned int ignore_fsid_mismatch:1;
> +     unsigned int avoid_meta_chunk_alloc:1;
> +     unsigned int avoid_sys_chunk_alloc:1;
> +
>  
>       int (*free_extent_hook)(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
>                               struct btrfs_root *root,
> diff --git a/extent-tree.c b/extent-tree.c
> index 93b1945..e7c61b1 100644
> --- a/extent-tree.c
> +++ b/extent-tree.c
> @@ -1904,6 +1904,16 @@ static int do_chunk_alloc(struct btrfs_trans_handle 
> *trans,
>           thresh)
>               return 0;
>  
> +     /*
> +      * Avoid allocating given chunk type
> +      */
> +     if (extent_root->fs_info->avoid_meta_chunk_alloc &&
> +         (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA))
> +             return 0;
> +     if (extent_root->fs_info->avoid_sys_chunk_alloc &&
> +         (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM))
> +             return 0;
> +
>       ret = btrfs_alloc_chunk(trans, extent_root, &start, &num_bytes,
>                               space_info->flags);
>       if (ret == -ENOSPC) {
> -- 
> 2.7.0
> 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to