On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 12:59:59AM +0100, Adam Borowski wrote:
> They're not even documented anywhere, letting users with no recourse but
> to RTFS.  It's no big burden to output the bitfield as words.
> 
> Also, display unknown flags as hex.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adam Borowski <[email protected]>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
> index c4af0cd..57d867d 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
> @@ -4333,6 +4333,43 @@ static struct reloc_control 
> *alloc_reloc_control(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
>  }
>  
>  /*
> + * printk the block group being relocated
> + */
> +static void describe_relocation(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
> +                             struct btrfs_block_group_cache *block_group)
> +{
> +     char buf[128]; // prefixed by a '|' that'll be dropped

Oh right, moving the buffer to the function is the right way.

As my main objection is addressed, we can proceed to the codinstyle.
Please don't use the // comments.

> +     u64 flags = block_group->flags;
> +
> +     if (unlikely(!flags)) // shouldn't happen

add explicit { ... } if there's an multi-statement else block, drop
'unlikely'

> +             strcpy(buf, "|NONE");
> +     else {
> +             char *bp = buf;

newline between declarations and code

> +#define DESCRIBE_FLAG(f, d) \
> +             if (flags & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_##f) { \
> +                     bp += snprintf(bp, buf - bp + sizeof(buf), "|%s", d); \
> +                     flags &= ~BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_##f; \
> +             }
> +             DESCRIBE_FLAG(DATA,     "data");
> +             DESCRIBE_FLAG(SYSTEM,   "system");
> +             DESCRIBE_FLAG(METADATA, "metadata");
> +             DESCRIBE_FLAG(RAID0,    "raid0");
> +             DESCRIBE_FLAG(RAID1,    "raid1");
> +             DESCRIBE_FLAG(DUP,      "dup");
> +             DESCRIBE_FLAG(RAID10,   "raid10");
> +             DESCRIBE_FLAG(RAID5,    "raid5");
> +             DESCRIBE_FLAG(RAID6,    "raid6");
> +             if (unlikely(flags))

drop 'unlikely'

> +                     snprintf(buf, buf - bp + sizeof(buf), "|0x%llx", flags);
> +#undef DESCRIBE_FLAG
> +     }
> +
> +     btrfs_info(fs_info,
> +                "relocating block group %llu flags %s",
> +                block_group->key.objectid, buf+1);

                   block_group->key.objectid, buf + 1);

space around a binary operator

> +}
> +
> +/*
>   * function to relocate all extents in a block group.
>   */
>  int btrfs_relocate_block_group(struct btrfs_root *extent_root, u64 
> group_start)
> @@ -4388,9 +4425,7 @@ int btrfs_relocate_block_group(struct btrfs_root 
> *extent_root, u64 group_start)
>               goto out;
>       }
>  
> -     btrfs_info(extent_root->fs_info,
> -                "relocating block group %llu flags %llu",
> -                rc->block_group->key.objectid, rc->block_group->flags);
> +     describe_relocation(extent_root->fs_info, rc->block_group);
>  
>       btrfs_wait_block_group_reservations(rc->block_group);
>       btrfs_wait_nocow_writers(rc->block_group);
> -- 
> 2.10.2
> 
> This is a version that uses a temp buffer on the stack, but does it in a
> separate function so it doesn't cost us anything when deep call chains are
> involved.  While balance that can trigger deep call chain, it's not called
> deeply itself.
> 
> This approach is simpler than mucking with allocs and avoids code
> duplication that would be needed for handling failed alloc.

Agreed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to