On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 6:48 PM, Chris Murphy <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Again, my data is fine. The problem I'm having is this: > https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git/tree/Documentation/filesystems/btrfs.txt?id=refs/tags/v4.10.1 > > Which says in the first line, in part, "focusing on fault tolerance, > repair and easy administration" and quite frankly this sort of > enduring bug in this file system that's nearly 10 years old now, is > rendered misleading, and possibly dishonest. How do we describe this > file system as focusing on fault tolerance when, in the identical > scenario using mdadm or LVM raid, the user's data is not mishandled > like it is on Btrfs with multiple devices? I think until these problems are fixed, the Btrfs status page should describe RAID 1 and 10 as mostly OK, with this problem as the reason for it not being OK. -- Chris Murphy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
