On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 17:07 -0400, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 09:28 -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > > On Wed, 2008-07-23 at 07:13 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > Chris, can you please put this patch in? Without it btrfs can't be > > > loaded on 32bit platforms. > > > > > > > I've pushed out a slightly different fix. The ordered extents are > > based on ram writeback, and so an unsigned long is enough. > > Does the job for me, although we still need the > s/BUG_ON(spin_trylock(&tree->lock))/assert_spin_locked(&tree->lock)/ > patch I sent a few days ago. > > Now I can actually build the module, load it and avoid it hitting a > BUG_ON() when it first tries to mount, I can perhaps move on to doing > something more useful with it... :)
;) My goal tonight is to figure out why I'm leaving locked data pages everywhere. Once that is done I'll be able to finally integrate the pending patches. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
