Ahmed Kamal wrote:
An experiment of applying RS codes for protecting data, worth a look
http://ttsiodras.googlepages.com/rsbep.html
He overwrites a series of 127 sectors and still manages to correctly
recover his data. We all know disks give us unreadable sectors every
now and then, so at least on workstations/laptops this could really be
useful ?
Advantage over single-disk-raid1 is storage efficiency (4.2MB becomes
5.2MB), that means we get 80% of useable disk space, instead of 50% if
I decide to raid1 everything ?
This is an interesting idea and could help recover from some types of
failures (for example, single head failures) or localized bad sectors
(think of dust or junk on the platter). This is almost certainly a big
win for single disk systems.
You would probably still need to RAID (or do other protection schemes)
to get enterprise class data availability since you clearly cannot
handle a full drive failure whenever you have multiple drives in a system.
Thanks!
ric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
