On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 14:34 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 02:37:02PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > > On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 13:56 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > Reporting this on behalf of ric. He was running the following fs_mark > > > command > > > > > > ./fs_mark -d /mnt/test -s 20480 -D 64 -t 8 -F > > > > > > Seems it hung and wasn't making any progress. He managed to get some > > > sysrq-t, > > > which is at http://people.redhat.com/jwhiter/fs-mark-hang.txt towards the > > > bottom > > > of the document. He could ctrl+c and unmount the fs so its not a hard > > > hang. > > > Looks like we've just locked up behind a page lock somewhere. I have to > > > run off > > > to class so I can't look into it too deeply so throwing this out there > > > hoping > > > somebody else figures it out :). Thanks, > > > > Which kernel was this?
> Its 2.6.25.14-108.fc9.x86_64 and its kernel-unstable since yesterday I think > he > said, its just shy whatever patches you've pushed into git recently, it has > yan's backref work plus a few other fixes. Thanks, > Well, the trace is strange because it looks like everyone is waiting on IO. Any chance once of the procs was spinning in system time? -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
