yanhai zhu wrote:
sorry,-- diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index 9b37ce6..04a0e58 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -2539,7 +2539,11 @@ int extent_readpages(struct extent_io_tree *tree, /* open coding of lru_cache_add, also not exported */ page_cache_get(page); if (!pagevec_add(&pvec, page)) + #if LINUX_VERSION_CODE >= KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,28) + __pagevec_lru_add_file(&pvec); + #else __pagevec_lru_add(&pvec); + #endif
Suggest sticking in some compat header: +#if LINUX_VERSION_CODE < KERNEL_VERSION(2,6,28) +# define __pagevec_lru_add_file __pagevec_lru_add +#endif To reduce impact on code that is intended to go to mainline. -- I have a truly marvellous patch that fixes the bug which this signature is too narrow to contain. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
