> I vote for the, get rid of the current inline, rename __always_inline to 

There is some code that absolutely requires inline for correctness,
like the x86-64 vsyscall code. I would advocate to keep the
explicit __always_inline at least there to make it very clear.

> inline, and then remove all non needed inlines from the kernel.

Most inlines in .c should be probably dropped.

> 
> We'll, probably start adding a lot more noinlines.

That would cost you, see the numbers I posted (~4.1% text increase)

-Andi
-- 
a...@linux.intel.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to