> Isn't the ioctl switch stack issue a separate GCC bug? > > It was/is assigning assigning separate space for local variables which
Was -- i think that got fixed in gcc. But again only in newer versions. > are mutually exclusive. So instead of the stack footprint of the > function with the switch() being equal to the largest individual stack > size of all the subfunctions, it's equal to the _sum_ of the stack sizes > of the subfunctions. Even though it'll never use them all at the same > time. > > Without that bug, it would have been harmless to inline them all. True. -Andi -- a...@linux.intel.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
