On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 10:31 PM, Chris Mason <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 15:25 +0800, Qinghuang Feng wrote: >> merge list_for_each and list_entry to list_for_each_entry. >> > > Thanks, I've queued this up. > Good, but....
Now I have made a new patch for cleanupping all the similar codes in btrfs. This patch has been tested in VM, it seems ok. Now should I rebuild another patch which based the previous patch, or could you be able to reverse the previous patch then I just post this new patch including all stuff? Sorry I am not much familiar with the posting flow, and I am not sure the meaning of "queued". -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
