On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:15:03AM +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote: > * Dave Chinner (da...@fromorbit.com) wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:31:50AM +0100, Eric Sesterhenn wrote: > > > * Pavel Machek (pa...@suse.cz) wrote: > > > > Does ext2/3 and vfat survive that kind of attacks? Those are 'in > > > > production' and should survive it... > > > > > > I regularly (once or twice a week) test 100 corrupted images of > > > vfat, udf, msdos, swap, iso9660, ext2, ext3, ext4, minix, bfs, befs, > > > hfs, hfs+, qnx4, affs and cramfs on each of my two test machines. > > > > Any reason you are not testing XFS in that set? > > So far the responses from xfs folks have been disappointing, if you are > interested in bugreports i can send you some.
Sure I am. It would be good if you could start testing XFS along with all the other filesystems and report anything you find. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner da...@fromorbit.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
