Hi,
Recently, I've red btrfsck.c of btrfs-progs to study the internal of btrfs.
However, I may find typo in pick_next_pending() of btrfsck.c
The first index of bits[] which is initialized should be 0, I think.
Signed-off-by: TARUISI Hiroaki <taruishi.hir...@jp.fujitsu.com>
---
diff --git a/btrfsck.c b/btrfsck.c
index 40c90f8..f961c9b 100644
--- a/btrfsck.c
+++ b/btrfsck.c
@@ -1920,7 +1920,7 @@ static int pick_next_pending(struct cache_tree *pending,
cache = find_first_cache_extent(reada, 0);
if (cache) {
bits[0].start = cache->start;
- bits[1].size = cache->size;
+ bits[0].size = cache->size;
*reada_bits = 1;
return 1;
}
--
taruisi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
