Chris Mason wrote:
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 03:12:38PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote:
Chris Mason wrote:
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 09:24:07AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
Sure, will try to get to it tomorrow.
Sorry, I missed a fix in the experimental branch. I'll push out a
rebased version in a few minutes.
Ok, the rebased version is ready to use.
New results are up for both with and without nodatacow. Not much change.
http://btrfs.boxacle.net/repository/raid/history/History.html
Have another run going with nodatacow and ssd.
Hi Steve,
I think I'm going to start tuning something other than the
random-writes, there is definitely low hanging fruit in the large file
creates workload ;) Thanks again for posting all of these.
Sure, no problem.
The history graph has 2.6.31-rc btrfs against 2.6.29-rc ext4. Have you
done more recent runs on ext4?
Yes, thanks for pointing that out, had so many issues I forgot to update
the graphs for other file systems. Just pushed new graphs with data for
2.6.30-rc7 for all the other file systems. This was from your
"newformat" branch from June 6th.
Steve
-chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
