On Wed, Sep 02, 2009 at 07:14:50PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 01:59:50PM -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 07:26:41PM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote: > > > Hi Chris, > > > > > > Don't know if this is a known issue, but I have btrfs (after my previous > > > inode_tree fixup patch) failing fsx-linux in Linus's current git tree. > > > > > > This makes it a bit hard for me to test my btrfs truncate conversion patch > > > unfortunately, though it does seem pretty stable so I will probably just > > > send it out anyway. > > > > > > Anyway, just a head's up. Oh, the way I reproduce is to create btrfs > > > on 1GB rd, run 4 instances of fsx-linux on different files in the root > > > directory, and run `while true ; do sync ; echo 3 > > > > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches; > > > done` at the same time. > > > > > > > Nick, > > > > I'll take a look at this later today and see what I can come up with. > > Thanks > > for reporting it. > > Any progress with this? Were you able to reproduce? >
I thought this was where the rb tree patch came from, sorry. I'll try to reproduce. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
