On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 01:16:56PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote: > Chris Mason wrote: > >On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 12:57:22PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote: > >>Steven Pratt wrote: > >>>Chris Mason wrote: > >>>>On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 04:41:48PM -0500, Steven Pratt wrote: > >>>>>Only bit of bad news is I did get one error that crashed the system > >>>>>on single threaded nocow run. So that data point is missing. > >>>>>Output below: > >>>>I hope I've got this fixed. If you pull from the master branch of > >>>>btrfs-unstable there are fixes for async thread races. The single > >>>>patch I sent before is included, but not enough. > >>>Glad you said that. Keeps me from sending the email that said the > >>>patch didn't help :-) > >>> > >>>Steve > >>Well, still getting oopses even with new code. > >> > >>Lots of: > >>Sep 16 11:07:27 btrfs1 kernel: [ 1862.942754] BUG: soft lockup - > >>CPU#10 stuck for 61s! [btrfs-endio-1:30250] > >>Sep 16 11:07:27 btrfs1 kernel: [ 1862.942754] Pid: 30250, comm: > >>btrfs-endio-1 Not tainted 2.6.31-autokern1 #1 IBM x3950-[88726RU]- > >>Sep 16 11:07:27 btrfs1 kernel: [ 1862.942754] RIP: > >>0010:[<ffffffff81153920>] [<ffffffff81153920>] crc32c+0x20/0x26 > > > >If I'm reading this right, you've got a softlockup in crc32c? Something > >has gone really wrong here. Are you reusing datasets from old runs? > From the second machine a single bug: > Sep 16 11:53:42 btrfs2 kernel: [ 3769.298240] ------------[ cut here
Ok, which mount options and job file is this from? -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
