Thanks for your greetings. I read your article, and could follow your idea, which looks very practical rule to me. But we may need some application which support to create or maintain these rules because the relation mount point and subvolumes and snapshots gets complicated as number of subvolumes increases.
Regards, taruisi (2010/01/05 2:20), Goffredo Baroncelli wrote: > On Monday 04 January 2010, TARUISI Hiroaki wrote: >> Buon anno, Goffredo. > あけまして おめでとう Taruisi, > > (I hope that happy new year is correctly written) >> >> Taking snapshot in btrfs is very easy, but handling snapshots is >> very confusing. So, we must make a rule of snapshotting such as >> your proposal, which seems to me very good and useful. >> If rules like this are forced regardless of operator's preference, >> this utility may become a deadwood. > > I detailed this idea in this article > > http://kreijack.blogspot.com/2010/01/linux-btrfs-example-of-layout.html > > BR > G.Baroncelli > -- taruisi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
