From: Christian Kujau <li...@nerdbynature.de> Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 21:13:00 -0800 (PST)
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2010 at 12:01, David Miller wrote: >> Can you rerun your test with the following patch applied? >> It will obtain more information for the btrfs developers. > > Thanks, David! Here it is: > > [ 1861.965178] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] > btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] > [ 1862.060546] Caller [100a6044:crc32c+0x44/0x80 [libcrc32c]] > [ 1862.126652] Kernel unaligned access at TPC[10101f18] > btrfs_csum_final+0x38/0x60 [btrfs] > [ 1862.221928] Caller [100a6044:crc32c+0x44/0x80 [libcrc32c]] > > It's always libcrc32c and the numbers stay the same too. Full dmesg here: > http://nerdbynature.de/bits/2.6.33-rc6/btrfs/ My debugging patch didn't work correctly. Can you try using this one instead? Thanks! diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/unaligned_64.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/unaligned_64.c index 378ca82..cbde2ea 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/unaligned_64.c +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/unaligned_64.c @@ -283,6 +283,9 @@ static void log_unaligned(struct pt_regs *regs) count++; printk("Kernel unaligned access at TPC[%lx] %pS\n", regs->tpc, (void *) regs->tpc); + printk("Caller [%lx:%pS]\n", + regs->tnpc, + (void *) regs->tnpc); } } -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
