Hi list

I tried to copy data from btrfs raid1 to another btrfs raid1 array. To increase 
the input/output blocksize from 512k to something bigger (4096k) I used 
dd_rescue.

zeros.bin input file is a 1GB size clone of /dev/zero:  dd_rescue -vwdDm1G 
/dev/zero /mnt/xxx/zeros.bin

now the actual copying process from /mnt/xxx to /mnt/yyy :

dd_rescue -vwdDm1 /mnt/xxx/zeros.bin /mnt/yyy/zeros.bin

resulting in this error message and no data written into /mnt/yyy :

dd_rescue: (warning): O_DIRECT requires hardbs of at least 4096!
dd_rescue: (warning): We don't handle misalignment of last block w/ O_DIRECT!
dd_rescue: (info): about to transfer 0.0 kBytes from /mnt/xxx/zeros.bin to 
/mnt/yyy/zeros.bin
dd_rescue: (info): blocksizes: soft 65536, hard 4096
dd_rescue: (info): starting positions: in 0.0k, out 0.0k
dd_rescue: (info): Logfile: (none), Maxerr: 0
dd_rescue: (info): Reverse: no , Trunc: no , interactive: no 
dd_rescue: (info): abort on Write errs: yes, spArse write: if err
dd_rescue: (info): ipos:         0.0k, opos:         0.0k, xferd:         0.0k
                   errs:      0, errxfer:         0.0k, succxfer:         0.0k
             +curr.rate:        0kB/s, avg.rate:        0kB/s, avg.load:  0.0%
dd_rescue: (info): problems at ipos 0.0k: Invalid argument 
                 fall back to smaller blocksize 
dd_rescue: (info): ipos:         0.0k, opos:         0.0k, xferd:         0.0k
                *  errs:      0, errxfer:         0.0k, succxfer:         0.0k
             +curr.rate:        0kB/s, avg.rate:        0kB/s, avg.load:  0.0%
dd_rescue: (warning): /mnt/xxx/zeros.bin (0.0k): Invalid argument!



Bad block: 0
dd_rescue: (info): ipos 0.0k promote to large bs again! 



Summary for /mnt/xxx/zeros.bin -> /mnt/yyy/zeros.bin:
dd_rescue: (info): ipos:         0.0k, opos:         0.0k, xferd:         0.0k
                   errs:      1, errxfer:         0.0k, succxfer:         0.0k
             +curr.rate:       10kB/s, avg.rate:        0kB/s, avg.load:  0.0%

----------------

If I don't use "dD" option it runs fine with a 512k blocksize

* OS in use is debian/squeeze
* kernel: 2.6.32-trunk-686 (linux-image-2.6.32-trunk-686)
* apt-cache policy btrfs-tools
  btrfs-tools:
  installed: 0.19-8
  candidate: 0.19-8

Raids where created like this:

mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 -m raid1 /dev/sdb1 /dev/sdc1
mkfs.btrfs -d raid1 -m raid1 /dev/sdb2 /dev/sdc2

cat /proc/mounts | grep btrfs
/dev/sdb1 /mnt/xxx btrfs rw,relatime 0 0
/dev/sdb2 /mnt/yyy btrfs rw,relatime 0 0

I believe this is a bug - feel free to share your thoughts
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
http://redirect.gimas.net/?n=M1002xHMValentin2
Herzig: Verschicke fertige Liebesgrüße als E-Mail! --
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to