On Friday 09 April 2010, Harshavardhana wrote:
> On 04/09/2010 02:07 PM, Harshavardhana wrote:
> > EBUSY is again meant for different reason where in a super block is
> > being locked or accessed by an Application which would mean unref on
> > that block would cause Application to go nuts. In such cases EBUSY is
> > returned.
> Ok i think ENOTSUPP could be another alternative? . This should be ok i
> guess?
I prefer ENOTSUP and EINVAL to EPERM.
But the man page of unlink (2) doesn't cite nor EINVAL nor ENOTSUP.
So at this point I have to admit that EPERM could be the best compromise.
But let me highlight that unlink(2) returns -EBUSY when an user try to delete
a mount-point. This is quite similar to unlink a subvolume.
So my list in order of preference is
1) EBUSY -> because it is used when unlink is called on a
mount-point and it is in the unlink (2) man page
2) EPERM -> because it is in the unlink man page, and it was
already discussed
3) ENOTSUP, EINVAL -> to me these make a lot of sense. But the man
page doesn't cite both of them
BR
Goffredo
> Regards
> --
> Harshavardhana
> http://www.gluster.com
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
gpg key@ keyserver.linux.it: Goffredo Baroncelli (ghigo) <kreijackATinwind.it>
Key fingerprint = 4769 7E51 5293 D36C 814E C054 BF04 F161 3DC5 0512
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
