On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Josef Bacik <jo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> + while (1) {
> + lock_extent(tree, start, end, GFP_NOFS);
> + ordered = btrfs_lookup_ordered_extent(inode, start);
> + if (!ordered)
> + break;
> + unlock_extent(tree, start, end, GFP_NOFS);
Is it ok not to unlock_extent if !ordered?
I don't know if you fixed this in a later version but it stuck out to me :)
--
Dmitri Nikulin
Centre for Synchrotron Science
Monash University
Victoria 3800, Australia
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
