On Thu, 6 Jan 2011 22:45:21 +0100 (CET), Jesper Juhl <j...@chaosbits.net> wrote: > > It seems to me that we leak the memory allocated to 'value' in > btrfs_get_acl() if the call to posix_acl_from_xattr() fails. > Here's a patch that attempts to correct that problem. > > Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <j...@chaosbits.net>
I posted a similar patch long time back. But never got picked up http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.file-systems.btrfs/6164 Message-id:"1279547924-25141-1-git-send-email-aneesh.ku...@linux.vnet.ibm.com" > --- > acl.c | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > compile tested only. > > diff --git a/fs/btrfs/acl.c b/fs/btrfs/acl.c > index 2222d16..6d1410e 100644 > --- a/fs/btrfs/acl.c > +++ b/fs/btrfs/acl.c > @@ -60,8 +60,10 @@ static struct posix_acl *btrfs_get_acl(struct inode > *inode, int type) > size = __btrfs_getxattr(inode, name, value, size); > if (size > 0) { > acl = posix_acl_from_xattr(value, size); > - if (IS_ERR(acl)) > + if (IS_ERR(acl)) { > + kfree(value); > return acl; > + } > set_cached_acl(inode, type, acl); > } > kfree(value); > > -aneesh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
