Excerpts from Chris Samuel's message of 2011-01-24 17:46:06 -0500: > On 25/01/11 08:39, Helmut Hullen wrote: > > > Regard the difference between "df" and "btrfs filesystem df". > > I suspect this is fixed in 2.6.38 with the following commit. > > BE WARNED: there are some fairly hairy changes to the pathname > lookup code to replace the BKL with RCU (not specific to btrfs) > and so if you are tempted to try it (currently 2.6.38-rc2) only > do so on a system that you don't care about data on and/or have > very good incremental backups of which you trust...
Yes, and you can pull in these commits on top of 2.6.37 or 2.6.36 by pulling in the btrfs-unstable git tree. But I do agree they should fix it. -chris -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
